Alfa Romeo F1 Team Secures $100M Sponsorship from Crypto Casino Stake.com

• Alfa Romeo F1 Team Stake has secured a $100 million sponsorship from crypto casino Stake.com
• The new year has seen renewed optimism in the crypto market, which has spurred an increase in crypto-related sponsorships
• Stake has a growing list of partnerships, including a deal with Everon football club and a collaboration with the rapper Drake for a Bitcoin giveaway

The crypto gambling platform based in Australia, Stake.com, has recently entered a partnership with the Alfa Romeo Racing team worth $100 million USD. This marks one of the first and biggest sponsorships since the catastrophic collapse of FTX exchange last year, which was known for its high-level and wide-reaching sponsorships.

The new year has brought optimism to the markets following a year-long period that saw prices tanking across the board. The price of Bitcoin has now rallied up around 40% year-to-date, and on-chain data increasingly suggests that the worst may be over. This resurgence in the crypto market, particularly with the rally of Bitcoin, has seemingly led to an increased interest in crypto-related sponsorships again.

As part of the partnership agreement with Stake, the racing team will adopt a new name, “Alfa Romeo F1 Team Stake” and it will be a long-term collaboration, as per the official statement. According to Bijan Tehrani, co-founder of Stake.com, the partnership with Alfa Romeo F1 Team Stake will expand opportunities for fan engagement through brand integration and activation. He also stated that the company is dedicated to improving race weekends by providing unique experiences for fans and increasing engagement in the digital space.

Crypto casino Stake has a growing list of partnerships, as the company has previously signed a deal with Everon football club, which was considered one of the most valuable sponsorship agreements in the team’s history. Additionally, it also collaborated with the rapper Drake for a Bitcoin giveaway.

This latest partnership between Stake and Alfa Romeo F1 Team Stake serves as a testament to the increasing presence of cryptocurrency in the sports industry. With crypto adoption continuing to grow, it is safe to say that crypto-related sponsorships will become more commonplace in the near future. Moreover, this partnership will also bring more awareness to the crypto space and help to further legitimize cryptocurrency as a form of payment.

IMF Proposes Five-Point Plan to Regulate Global Crypto Industry

• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has proposed a five-point plan to regulate the cryptocurrency industry.
• This plan calls for the licensing, registration, and authorization of crypto asset service providers, additional oversight for entities that carry out multiple functions in the cryptosphere, and strict prudential requirements for stablecoin issuers.
• The IMF also suggests that established financial institutions dealing in cryptocurrencies be subject to clear requirements regarding the risks associated with transacting in crypto, and that a robust, global crypto regulation and supervision framework be implemented.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has recently released a five-point plan to regulate the cryptocurrency industry. The plan is designed to provide a framework for exchanges, investors, and other financial service providers to work within in order to protect customers and promote the safety of the global financial system.

The first point of the plan calls for all crypto asset service providers to be licensed, registered, and authorized. This includes those providing storage, transfer, exchange, settlement, and custody services. Rules should be similar to those governing providers of services in the traditional financial sector, such as the requirement for customer assets to be held separately from the company’s own assets and the responsible authority to be clearly defined.

The second point calls for entities that carry out multiple functions in the cryptosphere to be subject to additional oversight. Any potential conflict of interest should be assessed by the responsible authority and prohibited, if necessary. These entities should also be subject to stringent regulations on transparency, so that all dependencies and operations can be clearly identified.

The third point is focused on stablecoin issuers, who should be subject to strict prudential requirements due to their increasing use as a store of value for investors. Without proper oversight and regulation, these holdings could destabilise monetary and financial stability, and in cases of major stablecoins a regulation on the scale of that employed in the banking sector could be required.

The fourth point is that established financial institutions dealing in cryptocurrencies should be subject to clear requirements regarding the risks associated with transacting in crypto. Finally, the IMF suggests that a robust, global crypto regulation and supervision framework be implemented. This is due to the borderless nature of cryptocurrencies, which has highlighted the ineffectiveness of national authorities to adequately deal with the digital coins.

In conclusion, the IMF’s five-point plan provides a framework for exchanges and investors to work within in order to ensure the safety and security of customers and the global financial system. It calls for licensing and registration of crypto asset service providers, additional oversight for entities carrying out multiple functions in the cryptosphere, strict prudential requirements for stablecoin issuers, and clear requirements for established financial institutions dealing in cryptocurrencies. Finally, it calls for a robust, global crypto regulation and supervision framework.

Mara Schmiedt on Liquid Staking: Security and Decentralization Trade-Offs

• Mara Schmiedt, CGO of Alluvial, discussed the impact of liquid staking on the crypto ecosystem and the future of staking.
• She also highlighted the importance of security and decentralization trade-offs that institutions and consumers should consider.
• Mara Schmiedt also published various research reports and papers on liquid staking, such as The Internet Bond and Ethereum 2.0 Staking Ecosystem Report.

In an exclusive interview with cryptonews.com, Mara Schmiedt, CGO of Alluvial, discussed how the crypto ecosystem is evolving and the implications of liquid staking. She also highlighted the importance of security and decentralization trade-offs that institutions and consumers should consider.

Mara Schmiedt is the Chief Growth Officer at Alluvial. She focuses on advancing industry participation and adoption of Liquid Collective, seeking out world-class partnership opportunities, and overseeing Business Development, Sales, and other strategic functions. Mara recently joined Alluvial as Chief Growth Officer from Coinbase, where she served as the Head of Sales for Coinbase Cloud, the leading developer platform for blockchain-based infrastructure products and APIs. She expanded Cloud’s staking business, supporting large-scale organizations, enterprises, and institutional investors. Prior to joining Coinbase, she managed Business Development at Bison Trails, a leading provider of blockchain-based infrastructure acquired by Coinbase in February 2021. Mara also served as Strategy Manager at ConsenSys, where she supported the strategic development of Codefi, the blockchain application suite for Web3 Commerce and Finance.

When discussing the impact of liquid staking on the crypto ecosystem, Mara Schmiedt emphasized the need for staking solutions that are both secure and decentralized. She noted that “liquid staking enables a more secure, more decentralized, and more efficient staking environment, while also enabling stakeholders to earn more rewards.” She also spoke about the importance of making sure that staking solutions are secure, highlighting the need for “security trade-offs that are appropriate for each individual use case.”

Mara Schmiedt also discussed the future of staking, noting that “it is important to ensure that staking solutions are both secure and decentralized in order to be successful in the long run.” She also highlighted the potential of staking solutions to drive adoption, noting that “staking solutions can also help drive adoption of blockchain technology by providing an easier way for users to get involved in the space.”

Finally, Mara Schmiedt also published various research reports and papers on liquid staking, such as The Internet Bond and Ethereum 2.0 Staking Ecosystem Report. She is passionate about open-source technology and has been an advocate for the use of liquid staking in the industry.

Overall, Mara Schmiedt’s interview highlighted the importance of security and decentralization trade-offs that institutions and consumers should consider when evaluating staking solutions. She also discussed the potential of liquid staking to drive adoption of blockchain technology and noted that it is important to ensure that staking solutions are both secure and decentralized in order to be successful in the long run.

BONK Token Sees 50% Drop in 24 Hours; Can Investors Buy the Dip?

• BONK, a new Solana-based meme token, has experienced a 50% decline in the last 24 hours, but is still up 2,000% since first listing at the end of December.
• The cryptocurrency had a fantastic opening week, rising from $0.000000086142 to $0.00000487 in just under a week, resulting in a gain of 5,500%.
• Although investors may be wondering if now is the time to ‘buy the dip’, the fact that BONK is a meme token with little real-world utility means that any long-term gains may be unlikely.

The new meme token BONK has had quite the journey since first listing at the end of December. After rising to as high as $0.00000487, it has now dropped by 50% in the last 24 hours to $0.00000182, but is still up by around 2,000% since first listing.

When it first listed, BONK saw a tremendous surge in interest, with the price rising from a mere $0.000000086142 to $0.00000487 in just under a week. This resulted in a gain of just over 5,500%, making its early holders (if not investors) a very sizeable profit.

However, the fact that the token has now dropped by 62.5% since reaching its all-time high yesterday suggests that its value may still be volatile. The self-proclaimed ‘first Solana dog coin for the people’ had an airdrop at the end of the year, with 50% of its total maximum supply of 100 trillion BONK being distributed among developers, creators, and NFT holders within the Solana community. This means that those who were lucky enough to receive the airdrop could have been the same people to benefit from the pump.

As such, some investors may be wondering if now is the time to ‘buy the dip’, but due to BONK having little real-world utility, any long-term gains may be unlikely. This means that while the token may still experience further declines, investors should be aware that any sustained rises over a long period of time may not be realistic.

Bitcoin Price Predicted to Reach $250,000 by End of 2021

• Bitcoin price remains flat in the past 24 hours, with a current price of $16,796.
• Bitcoin is down by 75% compared to its all-time high of $69,044, set back in November 2021.
• Experts have been predicting that bitcoin will enjoy significant gains this year, with some going even so far as to set a target of $250,000.

The cryptocurrency market has been relatively volatile in the past few months, with bitcoin, the world’s leading cryptocurrency, experiencing a significant dip in its price. Despite this, however, there has been an increase in optimism from some industry figures, with some believing that the price of bitcoin could reach a staggering $250,000 by the end of the year.

The current price of bitcoin stands at $16,796, marking a 1% increase in a week, although it is still down by 1.5% in a month and by 75% compared to its all-time high of $69,044, set back in November 2021. Despite this, the technical indicators suggest that it should be due a rally sooner or later, with its relative strength index (purple) languishing below 50 pretty much exclusively since early November, and its 30-day moving average (red) remaining well below its 200-day (blue) since the start of last year.

Tim Draper, a long-term bull of bitcoin, has set the ambitious target of $250,000 for the cryptocurrency, suggesting that it could reach this milestone as early as the middle of this year. He believes that bitcoin has not yet had the chance to benefit from the wave of institutional money that is expected to enter the market this year, which will drive up the price of BTC significantly.

Other figures in the industry have also been vocal in their predictions, with many forecasting that bitcoin will reach a price of around $20,000 by the end of 2021. This is in line with the predictions of numerous analysts, who anticipate that bitcoin will first experience a few more falls before it sees any significant gains.

Given the current state of the market, it is difficult to predict with any certainty what the price of bitcoin will be in the future. However, it is clear that the cryptocurrency is likely to enjoy significant growth this year, with some expecting it to hit the $250,000 mark by the end of the year and others predicting that it will reach a price of $20,000. Whether or not this optimistic outlook will be realized remains to be seen, but one thing is for sure – the future of bitcoin is looking brighter than ever.

Der Unterschied zwischen privaten und öffentlichen IP-Adressen

Ein Router oder ein anderer internetfähiger Rechner hat in der Regel zwei Arten von Netzwerkschnittstellen: interne und externe.

Jede Netzwerkschnittstelle muss eine IP-Adresse haben, um innerhalb oder außerhalb des Netzwerks kommunizieren zu können. Es gibt zwei Arten von IP-Adressen (in Bezug auf Erreichbarkeit, Einzigartigkeit und Namenskonventionen): öffentliche und private.

Öffentliche IP-Adresse

Eine IP-Adresse ist eine Nummer, die zur Identifizierung eines Hosts in einem IP-Netzwerk (Internet Protocol) verwendet wird. Um erfolgreich im Internet oder in einem anderen Computernetz kommunizieren zu können, muss ein Rechner über eine Netzwerkschnittstelle und eine IP-Adresse verfügen, die nur für dieses Netz gilt.

Eine öffentliche IP-Adresse ist eine IP-Adresse, die für das gesamte Internet eindeutig ist. Auf öffentliche IP-Adressen kann weltweit zugegriffen werden; sie werden daher häufig von öffentlich zugänglichen Einrichtungen wie Websites, DNS- und VPN-Servern usw. verwendet.

Die Anzahl der verschiedenen öffentlichen IPv4-Adressen ist begrenzt und sie werden einem Gerät in der Regel von einem Internetdienstanbieter (ISP) zugewiesen.

Statische IP-Adresse

Eine öffentliche statische Adresse – manchmal auch Dedicated genannt – bedeutet, dass sich die IP-Adresse nie ändert und an einen einzigen Benutzer, ein Gerät, einen Server oder eine Website gebunden ist.

Das obige Beispiel zeigt ein Szenario, in dem der Internet Service Provider (ISP) verschiedene Router mit eindeutigen und konstanten IP-Adressen ausstattet (sie ändern sich nie für jedes Gerät). In diesem Fall führt der Router das NAT-Verfahren anstelle des ISP durch, so dass der ISP “transparent” ist, wenn der Router Daten von entfernten Hosts im Internet sendet oder empfängt.

Die meisten Benutzer brauchen keine statischen IP-Adressen, aber eine statische IP-Adresse ist sehr wichtig, wenn externe Geräte, Websites oder Benutzer sich Ihre IP-Adresse für die ständige Verwendung merken müssen. Zum Beispiel, wenn Sie ständig Fernzugriff auf ein Gerät benötigen. Da sich die IP-Adresse nie ändert, müssen Sie oder andere Benutzer sich nur eine IP-Adresse merken, um das Gerät jederzeit zu erreichen.

Dynamische IP-Adresse

Öffentliche dynamische Adresse – bedeutet, dass sich die IP-Adresse von Zeit zu Zeit ändern kann (z. B. wenn Sie die Verbindung unterbrechen und wiederherstellen oder wenn der Internetanbieter die Adresse regelmäßig ändert).

Aus dem obigen Beispiel geht hervor, dass bei dynamischen IP-Adressen der Internetdienstanbieter den Routern private WAN-IP-Adressen zur Verfügung stellt, die dann bei der Verbindung mit entfernten Hosts im Internet in öffentliche IP-Adressen “übersetzt” werden. Der Hauptunterschied zu statischen IP-Adressen besteht darin, dass die vom Internetdienstanbieter bereitgestellten dynamischen IP-Adressen nicht dauerhaft sind. Sie ändern sich, wenn der Router die Verbindung trennt und wieder herstellt, sich bei einem Netzbetreiber neu anmeldet oder, in einigen Fällen, wenn der ISP die IP-Adressen regelmäßig aktualisiert.

Was den Fernzugriff betrifft, so verkomplizieren dynamische IPs die Situation, da es keine Möglichkeit gibt, festzustellen, welche IP-Adresse eine Gegenstelle zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt hat. Obwohl der Fernzugriff mit dynamischen IP-Adressen komplizierter ist, ist er nicht unmöglich und kann mit dem Dynamic DNS Service (Services → Dynamic DNS) erreicht werden. DNS oder Domain Name Service stellt Namen (wie www.google.com, www.facebook.com) für IP-Adressen bereit. Der dynamische DNS bindet IP-Adressen regelmäßig neu an einen Hostnamen. Bei der Verwendung von Dynamic DNS müssen Sie sich daher nur den Hostnamen merken, um ein bestimmtes Gerät jederzeit zu erreichen, auch wenn sich dessen IP-Adresse von Zeit zu Zeit ändert.

Gemeinsam genutzte IPs

Öffentlich gemeinsam genutzte IP-Adressen – in einigen Fällen kann ein ISP einer Gruppe von Nutzern eine öffentliche IP-Adresse zuweisen und dann NAT einsetzen, um deren Datenverkehr zu isolieren.

Im obigen Beispiel sehen wir, dass es möglich ist, dass sich mehrere Geräte (sogar Websites) eine einzige öffentliche IP-Adresse teilen. Ein ISP stellt den Kunden private WAN-IP-Adressen zur Verfügung und verwendet dann NAT, um zu unterscheiden, an welchen Host bestimmte Datenpakete gerichtet werden sollen.

Gemeinsam genutzte IPs haben jedoch einen großen Nachteil, da der Eigentümer eines Geräts oder einer Website nicht mehr allein für seine IP-Adresse verantwortlich ist. Wenn zum Beispiel einer der vielen Nutzer derselben IP-Adresse ein Online-Delikt begeht und die IP-Adresse gesperrt wird, werden alle Nutzer, die diese IP-Adresse verwenden, ebenfalls gesperrt.

Weitere Informationen über Network Address Translation (NAT) finden Sie hier.

Private IP-Adresse

Eine private IP-Adresse (intern) wird nur von Geräten verwendet, die untereinander im selben Netzwerk kommunizieren. Geräte mit privaten IP-Adressen können keine direkte Verbindung zum Internet herstellen. Ebenso können Computer oder andere Geräte außerhalb des lokalen Netzwerks keine direkte Verbindung zu einem Gerät mit einer privaten IP-Adresse herstellen.

Eine IP-Adresse gilt als privat, wenn die IP-Nummer in einen der IP-Adressbereiche fällt, die für private Netzwerke wie ein lokales Netzwerk (LAN) reserviert sind. Die Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) hat die folgenden drei Blöcke des IP-Adressraums für private Netzwerke (lokale Netzwerke) reserviert:

  • 10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255 (Adressen insgesamt: 16.777.216)
  • 172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255 (Adressen insgesamt: 1.048.576)
  • 192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255 (Adressen insgesamt: 65.536)

Terminologie der IP-Adresse

Statisch bedeutet, dass sich die IP-Adresse nie ändert, solange Sie bei demselben Anbieter oder Server bleiben.

Dynamisch bedeutet, dass sich die IP-Adresse von Zeit zu Zeit ändern kann.

Öffentlich bedeutet, dass die IP-Adresse über das Internet von jedem Computer auf der Welt erreicht werden kann.

Privat bedeutet, dass die IP-Adresse nur von anderen Geräten im selben Netzwerk erreicht werden kann.

Shared bedeutet, dass außer Ihnen noch andere Personen Ihre IP-Adresse für ihre Verbindung verwenden.

Dediziert bedeutet, dass niemand sonst Ihre IP-Adresse für seine Verbindung nutzt.

Die Klasse identifiziert den Bereich Ihrer IP-Adresse und die Standard-Subnetzmaske. Beispiele für IP-Klassen:

  • Klasse A – 0 bis 127 mit einer Standardmaske von 255.0.0.0
  • Klasse B – 128 bis 191 mit der Standardmaske 255.255.0.0
  • Klasse C – 192 bis 223 mit einer Standardmaske von 255.255.255.0
  • Klasse D – 224 bis 247 (derzeit nicht verwendet)
  • Klasse E – 248 bis 255 (derzeit nicht verwendet)